Monday, January 10, 2011

"Nigger Jim" is now "Slave Jim"

There’s much controversy over a new edition of "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" that replaces the word "nigger" with "slave."  I wholeheartedly agree that the change does the original Twain novel a major disservice.  The language police are everywhere.
            I recall several contacts I had with the language police during my years spent in broadcast and print journalism.  Several years ago when I was writing the weekly Auctions and Antiques column in the Philadelphia Daily News. I would preview various auctions on tap for the coming weekend.  One of them featured a piece of furniture known commonly as a “Mammy Bench,” like the type and style found in plantation mansions during and after the Civil War.  It was sat upon by female slaves nursing the offspring of their owners.  The description “Mammy Bench” has over the years come to describe that type and style of bench with no other particular meaning attached. The description apparently emotionally irked, or upset or worse, a female African-American Daily News Editor who directed that the description be deleted or changed.  I told her that it was the name of that particular piece of furniture and that calling it something else would not adequately describe what it looked like. She was unmoved and the description was changed.  So much for accuracy.  
            Years earlier toiling as a news reporter and producer at KYW-TV I submitted a story idea to a newsroom executive about an art exhibition at a Philadelphia museum that included a controversial work depicting breast-feeding.  “We’re not going to cover that crap,” declared the news exec. who to this day chirps loudly and proudly about his wonderful contributions to news coverage in the Philadelphia-Metro market. 
            I also recall an incident not entirely related but one which left an indelible stain on my mind.  I was part of a group of reporters touring a Philadelphia elementary school which had been touted as a “progressive” one in which test scores were improving.  We stopped in a classroom where third or fourth graders were drawing trees.  One girl had sketched a skinny tree with almost bare branches, a drawing she appeared proud of.  A teacher leaned over her shoulder and told the little girl “Oh that’s not how we draw a tree.  A tree has full, leafy branches,” and proceeded to draw over the girl’s drawing.  The girl appeared crestfallen, her creativity stifled.  So much for correcting what didn’t need correcting in the first place, kind of like "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn."

2 Comments:

At January 10, 2011 at 7:38 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

The problem with this type of censorship, unfortunately, is that there is no opposition to it in the mainstream media. So many Americans are deathly afraid of being branded with the scarlet "R" that they wont stand up for common sense and free speech. The closest we came to that in recent memory was the Imus scandal, when everyone was up in arms over a somewhat innocuous comment...some members of the media stood up and defended Imus. Let's make it clear, THERE IS NO GOD-GIVEN RIGHT IN THIS NATION TO "NOT BE OFFENDED".

With the Huck Finn example, how does one teach our youth what progress is if we can't show how we've progressed from a time where Afro-Americans had no right to be free and gain meaningful employment...such as the President of the United States, for example.

It's important for Americans and groups representing our rights, like the ACLU, to stand up for all free speech, not just free speech coming from the left wing. If we made a stink about this every time...maybe people would realize that we don't want our rights thrown out to keep people from being offended.

After all, if history has taught us anything, Americans have accomplished great things in response to being offended.

 
At January 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM , Blogger Unknown said...

Steve: As a lover of literary classics and the First Amendment, the ugliness and cruelty of history cannot be erased by a professor's censorship/revision of Mark Twain's book. Granted, the original version may not be appropriate for grade schoolers, but it's not too hard for high schoolers to be reminded of slavery's brutality. Their "virgin" ears and eyes are already well acquainted with R rated movies and its usual graphic violence, distastesful rap music lyrics, daily quota of crime news, etc.
Is this professor also going to minimize the cruelty of "Uncle Tom's Cabin" and the sexual references in "Ulysses," "Catcher In the Rye," "Lady Chatterley's Lover," ad infinutum?
His action is tantamount to the book burning in "Fahrenheit 451". Let's never forget what Adolf Hitler did to books he outlawed.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home